Reckless Charge of Bias from Hilton Head Hacker

A comment by David Henson of Hilton Head, S.C., deserves a considered reply. He asks, “Does the site of your most recent (golf) victory, i.e., Palmetto Hall on Hilton Head Island, get a mention??”

Henson is referring to my triumph (with an unnamed partner whose initials are D.H.) in the Contested Handicap Flight of the 2009 Palmetto Hall Plantation Club Member-Guest. And while I appreciate his mention of our five-match blitzkrieg over some of Palmetto Hall’s most-accomplished mid-handicappers, I have to correct the impression he leaves — that my Top 50 course rankings are in some way influenced by subjective criteria. The fact that I was fed and entertained for four days; treated to 60-some-odd holes of free golf; gifted with a dozen logoed golf balls, a designer golf shirt and sundry other golf-related items; and, at tournament’s end, awarded a ceramic champion’s urn of Grecian motif (suitable for displaying one’s ashes after acceptance into the St. Peter’s Golf & Country Club) — none of that can impact the secret Cal Sci algorithm behind the Top 50 rankings.

To refute any claims of bias, I will merely point out that the Robert Cupp course, the more difficult of Palmetto Hall’s two championship layouts, languishes at No. 783 on the most recent JG Top 50. “Too much water, too many trees, and the greens aren’t level,” complains my most experienced course rater. Another evaluator calls the Cupp’s single-cut-of-rough policy “barbaric … The perfectly struck drive, of which I hit many, rolls through the fairway and disappears into 5-inch Bermuda rough. On any other course I would have shot 95 or better, but I stormed off Palmetto Hall without turning in my scorecard.”

Granted, that was 2-½ years ago. When I played Palmetto Hall last September, the rough on both courses was cut at a reasonable height and the surrounding pine forest produced the statistically proper ratio of bounce-backs into the fairway versus balls lost in the woods — i.e., 4 to 1. If it were a restaurant, I would have given the Cupp course 4-½ forks.

Whether design tweaks and storm damage have pushed Palmetto Hall into the Top 50 remains to be seen. Meanwhile, I’ll be checking random variables with the Bomar Brain and re-reading chapters of Douglas R. Hofstadter’s Godel, Escher, Bach. The tentative release date for my updated Top 50 is January 17.


Filed under golf

5 responses to “Reckless Charge of Bias from Hilton Head Hacker

  1. John Harrity

    I’m waiting for you to respond to my reply in your blog. I asked about you not listing any New England courses in your “The Top 50′ list.
    What’s up with this?

    • John, these things can’t be rushed! Especially when we’re busy finalizing the design for the soon-to-be-launched

      • John Harrity

        I think that you are loafing in your cellar. I can see you now: feet up, snacking on a McDonald’s double cheeseburger, side of fries (supersized!), and a cold refreshing 7Up. You probably have a putting machine, golf matt, and net set up too! You’re tinkering with your swing; aren’t you? Admit it! Who are you kidding about “these things can’t be rushed”??? Get back to work.
        All the best,

      • John, you’re just going to have to cut me some slack on this one. I’ve put some people on your question about the surprisingly lack of New England courses in the Top 50. As soon I get their report, I’ll post something. (To be honest, I put them on it a few days ago. They came back with a list of new courses in England.)

  2. Jim Herre

    Love your Top 50, John. Have this strange feeling that I’ve been to almost all of them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s